Archive for October, 2005

2005 Indy Wine Competition and the 2005 Dixie Fair Results

Saturday, October 29th, 2005

I am quite far behind with everything in my life, but I sat down for an hour or so today and parsed through the results of the 2005 Dixie Fair.

It’s difficult to identify what’s going on in the industry from two very different wine competitions, and it’s made even more difficult because there are no lists of wineries that competed.   But for what it’s worth, here’s my take on the two competitions.

Indy Wine Competition

The Indy Wine Competition is well respected across the world.  It’s not the creme de la creme of wine competitions, but you’ll see some consistency with the winners from Indy also doing very well in other, more high brow, competitions.  Doing well at Indy is a good thing.   There were 3685 wines entered into the competition at Indy, of those 296 received a Gold, 1074 received a Silver and 1218 received a bronze.   That’s 2588 received some sort of award of the 3685 wines entered.  From a marketing perspective, the odds seem pretty damn good that you’ll get something at Indy if you have a half a brain.

Because of that I will not be listing those wines from North Carolina that won a bronze.  Big deal.  There’s so much bad wine in the world, congrats on beating out the worst of the worst for the coveted bronze.  

Dixie Fair

The Dixie Fair is a whole other story.  It’s just a fun competition.  The results mean nothing, so you beat out other North Carolina wines from a panel of judges at a fair.  If you are a winery and you win an award at the Dixie Fair and you put that award on your website it tells the world that your wine probably sucks and that’s the only award you could get.  Virtually every wine at the Dixie wins some sort of award.  I don’t have the numbers in front of me, but it’s like 90% or something of all wines win a prize.  It’s about the only game at the fair that you have legitimate shot at winning something.  :-)

Summary

North Carolina wineries won 23 awards at the Indy Wine Competition.  

I was very happy to see that Raffaldini entered this competition.  More and more I am digging the prowess and marketing savvy of the folks at Raffaldini.  I think they are in a league of their own.  This can only be a result of a talented team and the collective experience of the owners and managers.  They have been successful in other ventures outside of wine and are applying that knowledge to make fine wine in North Carolina.  They are to be lauded.

I don’t know how many wines they entered in this competition, but they received two awards.   One was a bronze for their Pinot Grigio, no biggie there.  However they took home a BEST OF CLASS for their 2004 Bianco – a White Vinifera Blend.   That’s a GOLD at Indy and that’s pretty damn good.

Here’s more information:

2004 Raffaldini Bianco – Gold Medal Winner and Best of Class at 2005 Indy Wine Competition

Bianco

A blend of Chardonnay, Malvasia Bianca & Vermentino. “Springtime in a bottle.” Tropical fruit fragrances predominate in this refreshing blend. Notes of white peaches and pineapple on the finish.

and guess what?  It’s only $11.00 from their website.

Nice work.   I also have to laud Raffaldini for not diluting their brand by entering their wines in the Dixie Classic competition.  I’m assuming they didn’t anyways, because I didn’t see any of their wines on the results.

Childress Vineyards

It seems that the Childress marketing machine is in high gear.  They entered a ton of wines and came away with a bunch of bronzes and one silver:

2003 Childress Vineyards Syrah / Shiraz – Silver

That’s a notable accomplishment, congratulations go out to Childress.  That’s a wine I need to try. 

Varietals_13

Looks like it’s sold out at the winery, however it did retail for $16.99 when they had it in stock.

RagApple Lassie Vineyards

RagApple took home a silver for their 2003 Chardonnay.  RagApple has consistently done well with the Chardonnay and Viognier.  It’s nice to see that their hard work continues to pay off!

“…A barrel fermented, sur lie: Full bodied and buttery, this wine is sophisticated and polished with a beautiful golden color and floral fragrances.  It offers plenty of heady lemon custard and orange blossom flavors with hints of mango, papaya, and pineapple in the margins.  Vanilla and a touch of spice complete the long silky finish…”

$15.00 from their website. 

Cow_moon_animation

Biltmore Estate, Duplin and Silver Coast Winery

Biltmore Estate always seems to do a nice job with their wines.  However, most of the grapes they use to accomplish this success are bought from outside North Carolina.  Therefore, I don’t give them much press.

Gold – Sparkling Brut (Nive work regardless of where the grapes originated!)

Silver – 2003 Cabernet Sauvignon, Chateau Reserve

Duplin won several Golds and Silvers for their Scuppernong and Muscadine wines, but that shouldn’t be a big surprise, that’s pretty much what they specialize in and seem to do a really good job.   I have never been to Duplin, but they get quite a bit of press for their wines.

Silver Coast Winery won a Silver for their 2004 Viognier and also a bronze for their 2004 Merlot, which I thought was notable as it was the only red wine from North Carolina that earned an award.

P213

It’s priced at a whopping $28.00!  For that price it had better be good!

“..A very clean, crisp and austere example of this elegant grape variety. Nuances of jasmine and honeysuckle flowers marry seamlessly with white peach and melon fruit…”

Shelton Vineyards was curiously absent from both competitions, although I did see one wine place in the Dixie Competition. 

 

 

Using Cover Crops to Make Great Wine

Saturday, October 29th, 2005

Using Cover Crops to Make Great Wines

by Jim Law

My never ending quest to make great wine has led me down some unusual paths. For the past several years, I have been working with under vine cover crops with the goal of creating a more balanced vine. I have found that worldwide there is universal agreement on very few winegrowing concepts, but one rare exception is the premise that a balanced vine produces the best potential wines. In this context I define “balanced” as a vine that fills its allotted trellis space with a thin, airy canopy. The vines have no significant lateral growth, and shoot tips stop growing at veraison. The vineyard requires at most one light hedging and very little leaf pulling.

Although, quite frankly, the title of this article is a bit of a ruse in order to draw the reader into an otherwise admittedly boring subject, it is the latest focus of my viticultural efforts at Linden Vineyards. My travels to France and California have confirmed that only small, balanced vines produce great wines. In France the best sites have depleted, restrictive, excessively well-drained soils. In California they achieve vine size and balance through deficit irrigation. In the East we have high capacity soils with water falling at God’s will. This is a problem.

The idea is to use a cover crop to compete with the vine for both water and nutrients in order to make the vines smaller and more balanced. This, in theory, would improve wine quality and reduce vineyard canopy management costs. Improving wine quality and reducing labor costs are a rare win/win concept in winegrowing. Other possible benefits could include drawing water out of the soil in a rainy fall, reduced chemical use, and achieving more biodiversity. Many of us have discovered that in winegrowing, theory and practice don’t often coincide. I would like to comment on my own practical experiences. I must include a disclaimer that the following is primarily anecdotal and only based on three growing seasons. Tony Wolf at Virginia Tech will be doing more focused, controlled work with cover crops as the result of recently secured grant money.

In 2003 I planted three different cover crops under a diversity of vineyard panels with differences in soils, varieties and ages. I was especially encouraged by the way Creeping Red Fescue (CRF) slowed vine vigor and by its low growing and invasive growth habits. In 2004 I enthusiastically planted CRF under 60% of my vines. In some cases, CRF balanced excessively vigorous vines beautifully, but in other cases it “choked” the vines, causing weak growth and nutritional deficiencies. My “take away” message from all of this is: 1) most vine roots are superficial; 2) soil water holding capacity seems to trump all other causes of vigor, including rootstock and variety; and 3) if a vineyard is only marginally sufficient in certain nutrients, cover crops will probably put it over the edge. In 2005 I reluctantly decided to go back to using herbicides, fine-tuning the strips according to perceived vine vigor. In my high vigor blocks, I only put herbicide on a small ring around the base of the vine. In our humid growing conditions, having vegetative growth right next to the vine crown is probably a bad idea. The crown was always moist and it seemed as if this could be a breeding ground for problems. I opted to carefully burn the surrounding CRF with herbicides.

One of my goals was to greatly reduce or eliminate the use of herbicides. Unfortunately, at this time that has not been achievable. Early this year I used Round-up or Gramaxone to burn narrow strips under the vines and I continue to maintain those strips. Moderate vigor blocks have a 12” strip, lower vigor vines have a wider strip. In addition, we are trying to regulate the growth and competitiveness of the cover crops by both physically mowing (I use an under-the-vine swinging arm mower) and by “chemical mowing” (using low rates of herbicides to kill the weeds growing in the cover crops and to stunt the cover crop’s growth). I have found that especially during the period from bloom until a few weeks pre-veraison, too much cover crop competition can trigger severe nutritional deficiencies. We have been attempting to “stun” the cover crops during this phase, but not kill them, so that by veraison the grasses are back growing and competing with the vines. Interestingly, it seems that CRF is fairly Round-up resistant at low rates. I let the cover crop grow unencumbered from veraison on in order to keep new vine shoot growth in check and also theoretically to transpire out any late season rains that could have a negative impact on fruit quality. My vineyard floor looks like a mess, but I try to keep reminding myself to look up at the canopy, not at the ground.

One of my goals in deciding to work with cover crops was to transition from monoculture (“di-culture” if you include the existing Kentucky 31 Fescue in-row cover crop) to a more heterogeneous environment. I did accomplish this to some degree by experimentally sowing low growing “wild flowers” under one row. My studies and readings on biodynamics have influenced my new approach to looking at the vineyard as part of a larger ecosystem. As my vineyard ages, I am seeing mites and insects to go from no problem to more of a major concern. This makes sense to me as certain species of insects such as grape berry moth and grape root borer feel at home in a vine-dominated ecosystem. My hope is that through diversity I can build a more balanced system with predator insects balancing the population of economically damaging mites and insects. At this point I have no idea if this will be the case. In fact there is some anecdotal information that cover crops can increase grape root borer and leaf hopper populations in vineyards.

There is a trend worldwide now towards small vine viticulture and closer vine spacing. After experiencing trunk damage as a result of the dreary 2003 growing season, I have seen that “renewal” viticulture may be a reality, even as far south as Virginia. By using a couple of suckers, small vines are easy to get back into full production, whereas large vines occupying more trellis area require several years. I am now planting 6.5 to 7 feet by 4 feet, but remain nervous about possible canopy crowding. I feel that cover crops will be an important tool in the East for those who pursue closer spacing.

I think that cover cropping will be a very good viticultural tool. I have made good progress in my main goal, which is to reduce vigor and to contribute to the possibility of growing smaller vines, but many questions still remain. What will happen as the cover crops mature and begin to add back organic matter as they decompose? How will drought affect the vine/cover crop relationship? Can we use cover crops to fine-tune vine vigor at different stages during the growing season in a manner reflecting the West Coast’s ability to do the same with irrigation?

Wedding Photo Slideshow

Tuesday, October 11th, 2005

Click on this link to view the first of many slideshows of our wedding:

http://allurephotous.com/DoddKleinheksel.html

Wedding and Honeymoon!

Tuesday, October 11th, 2005

Jen and I are officially married! It was bar none the best day and weekend of my life. No blog post could possibly describe how well it all came off, and how beautiful Jen was on our wedding day. It was amazing…friends, family, great band, great food, excellent wine, beautiful church and tent, incredible service at Grassy Creek and Hampton Inn….it all made me very emotional. :-)

Anyways, I will be building out an entirely new site dedicated to the wedding and all the fun we had once we get back from Jamaica. For now, check out the pictures in our photo album and please be patient during my absence!

Article in Sundays Winston Salem Journal

Monday, October 3rd, 2005

Thanks to my neighbor Peter Ness for catching this!

 

Field of Growth

North Carolina’s wine industry, much of it in the Yadkin Valley, gets bigger, but viticulturists have much to learn

By Sherry Youngquist

JOURNAL REPORTER

Sunday, October 2, 2005


Van Coe, harvests Syrah grapes from Stony Knoll Vineyards on Saturday morning. Coe, along with his family, owns and operates the vineyard.

Van Coe, harvests Syrah grapes from Stony Knoll Vineyards on Saturday morning. Coe, along with his family, owns and operates the vineyard. 

(Journal Photo by Megan Morr)

 

MOUNT AIRY – Last month, the N.C. Grape Council added the word “wine” to its name and moved from the N.C. Department of Agriculture to the N.C. Division of Tourism. The move indicated a small but significant shift in thinking about the state’s growing wine industry.

Council members asked for the change because they wanted to focus on marketing and tourism, said Margo Knight, the executive director of the N.C. Wine and Grape Council.

“If you can draw a tourist to a North Carolina winery, No. 1, you’ve created a personal experience between your customer and your product,” Knight said. “Therefore, you’ll sell more wine. Therefore, you’ll bring money to these rural communities where the wineries are located and increase tax revenues and have a positive impact on the state.”

In North Carolina’s wine country, at least for now, it’s not all about the wine.

For every dollar spent on wine in the state, four more are spent because of wine, industry officials estimate. And many of those dollars are coming from within North Carolina.

“When you’re in a young wine industry, your market is almost always in your own backyard, so to speak,” Knight said.

Grapes may never surpass the production of such commodities as hogs or soybeans, state agriculture officials say. They are unlikely to replace tobacco, as many people hope, though they thrive in similar soil and climate.

And even though wine may be one of the state’s most enticing ventures in memory, an export wine industry is years away, experts say.

It remains to be seen whether the quality of wine produced here can ever rival counterparts in California, Oregon or other states with better growing conditions, better research and a longer history of viticulture.

But wineries and vineyards in North Carolina – many of which are in the Yadkin Valley – can sell the romance and mystique of wine.

People remember quality

Donna and Mike Rupp weren’t planning to make any stops en route from Pennsylvania to their daughter’s wedding in the Charlotte area last month. But one “wine tours” sign and a highway exit later, they were sipping Chardonnay and merlot inside the 1930s milking parlor that vintner Kim Myers had turned into a tasting room and gift shop.

Myers, whose background is in advertising and graphic art, didn’t know much about growing grapes and making wines 10 years ago. And back then, motorists coming through Interstate 77 and U.S. 421 would have passed the farm, a former dairy, with little care.

But not today.

Laurel Gray Vineyards, which Myers has owned with her husband, Benny, in Hamptonville since 2000, is part of the growing tourism industry that many small towns in the Yadkin Valley are trying to bolster.

To measure the intense interest in wine, look no further than the rapid expansion of wineries and vineyards in North Carolina. The number of wineries has more than doubled in five years – from 21 in 2000 to 50 today, with about another five expected to open by the end of 2005. At least 350 vineyards produce grapes for wine production; many of them are in the Yadkin Valley.

“The state has spent a lot of money marketing the wines that are being produced,” said Grant Holder, a chemistry professor at Appalachian State University. “Now, they should concentrate on maximizing the quality of the wine, maximizing consistency so that those prices that must be charged for North Carolina wines are true reflections of the quality.”

But Holder points out that people associate wine with place. If they don’t like the quality of the wine they drink at a North Carolina winery, they’ll remember. So, if two wineries here make quality wine but two others are having problems, it reflects on the state as a whole, he said.

“People will pay a lot of money for wine if they like it. They won’t if they don’t,” he said.

Consistency in the quality of the state’s wines is one of the bigger challenges the industry faces as it grows, said Gil Geise, a viticulture instructor at Surry Community College. Quality, he said, starts in the vineyard, where some say that about 75 percent of wine-making begins.

Van Coe and his wife, Kathy, can testify that it’s hard to get it right.

Always learning

The Coes run Stony Knoll Vineyard in Rockford.

About five years ago, they decided to plant five acres of grapes on the Surry County farm that had been in Kathy Coe’s family for more than 100 years. Like many of the growers who have ventured into grapes, both of them came from farming families but did not consider themselves farmers.

“Van wanted to do something to preserve the family farm,” said Kathy Coe, who works full time as a registered nurse. “This was the farm I was raised in. It was tobacco when I was growing up. It’s the field I said I would never go back to.”

Van Coe, who works full time running Homeland Mortgage in Dobson, took night classes in viticulture at Surry Community College. His brother-in-law Lynn Crouse, who was interested in becoming a winemaker, took some classes in wine science.

After the Coes spent nearly $600,000 to plant vines on their 48-acre farm and build a winery, the wait began. For some, the wait can be anywhere from five to seven years for vines to fully mature. But the Coes had their first real harvest in October 2004, they said. That’s when the learning really began for the Coes.

“We incorrectly trellised,” said Van Coe, shaking his head.

The Syrah vines that had been planted so carefully in 2001 were too close. Coe put them in at six feet apart, and the vines proved to grow more vigorously than he had planned. He was forced to pull out every other vine on the rows.

“I should have gone with a smaller root stock,” Coe said. “It was painful. You had a growing season on a vine that you had to accept that you had to remove.”

At harvest, he and his brother-in-law overlooked adding a material to some of the grapes used to kill small bugs and fungus, which contaminate the wine.

This fall, Coe said he is taking steps to not make the same mistakes. But with each harvest, as the family members encounter more of the operation, they are learning more, he said.

“So, it’s a moving target,” said Coe, who has pursued a marketing plan for his Stony Knoll Vineyards and makes wine only from the grapes he grows there. “You don’t know what you’re going to encounter next.”

Norm Oches builds and designs vineyards in the Yadkin Valley. In his experience, the Coe family’s steep learning curve is typical.

“It’s a relatively small industry. So, a lot of people have an interest in doing this all by themselves. So, everybody relearns everything,” Oches said.

Growers say they need to be able to turn to viticulturists for help with these issues. Though agricultural-extension agents working in each county stay in close contact with vineyard owners, it’s not enough, said Joanne Crater, who owns Buck Shoals Vineyard in Hamptonville with her husband, Terry.

The N.C. Department of Agriculture has planted vines at its research station in Reidsville, but Myers said that it doesn’t apply to her Laurel Gray Vineyard in Yadkin County.

“I would like to see research plots at several vineyards scattered about. We are considerably different here in the Swan Creek area. The soil’s different,” Myers said.

Growers want access to current research that is specific to their region. In the state’s young wine industry, such specifics are in short supply.

Some efforts are now under way to change that, however.

Appalachian State University is making plans to open a wine services laboratory next spring. The university has requested $1million in federal money to set up equipment and hire personnel, and more money has been requested from the Golden LEAF Foundation. Surry Community College is also making plans to open a viticulture research center.

“There’s not a lot of natural collaboration that goes on in the farming community. You tend to be very competitive and secretive without a lot of saying so,” Holder said.

“Everybody is basically in the same boat. They have to share the ideas and tips they come up with,” he continued. “It’s all very new here…. It’s not terribly easy to grow a vinifera grape here. What do you have to do to get that grape that has sugar and color that is going to make a quality wine?”

Careful attention needed

Grapes can grow anywhere, Giese said, but their quality depends on a complex set of variables, including soil type, rainfall and temperature.

Sure, California and France have oceans to moderate their temperatures, he said. And North Carolina grapes are prone to fungal diseases because of humidity and rainfall. But with careful attention, grapes do well here.

One big piece of the puzzle for North Carolina’s wine industry, he said, is figuring out which types of grapes grow the best here.

“What we really need is a signature grape,” said Giese, who came to Surry County from the University of Arkansas. “You think of Oregon, you think pinot (pinot noir). Napa, they grow cab (cabernet). It does really well. What grows well here? That’s still the question.”

But because rainfall and humidity force growers in North Carolina to harvest grapes early at 21 or 22 percent sugar – rather than the ideal 24 or 25 percent sugar – the answer to that question may be to breed a whole new variety, possibly one that thrives in wet conditions.

But would it be accepted?

“The problem is the wine-drinking world wants particular wine-drinking varieties,” said Andy Walker, a viticulture professor and grape breeder at the University of California at Davis.

Walker, who has visited the Yadkin Valley, said that the region’s growers would always have to compensate for the early harvest of grapes, either through viticulture techniques or in winemaking and blending.

“Learning that is going to be the tricky part,” he said.

Though the majority of grapes in the United States are grown in California, Washington, New York and Oregon, grapes are grown across the country, even Minnesota and South Dakota, Walker said.

“In California, where grapes are harvested at 24 or 25 percent sugar, the tannins and flavor compounds change at that time and lead to better quality and more balanced wine styles,” he said.

Combination of factors

Mark Rosse, a chef and owner of the Louisiana Purchase restaurant in Banner Elk, has been making wine lists in the state for his restaurant and others from Greensboro to the coast. Very few North Carolina wines make the list, he said.

He looks for terroir- a French term encompassing the value of the fruit, soil, climate and practices of a particular place. He also considers identity. He said he doesn’t want five chardonnays on the list that taste exactly the same.

“North Carolina has an identity crisis, and there is the quality and price ratio,” Rosse said. “I have seen the quality level jumping. But there has to be more. There has to be a wine at some point that jumps out and says this is what North Carolina is all about.”

Some of the wineries have won regional and national awards. The Wine Report Magazine last year named Shelton Vineyards’ 2003 riesling as one of the country’s best “50 Forbidden Wines.” It was the first North Carolina wine to appear on such a list.

For his part, Walker says that North Carolina’s focus on developing a local market and following for the state’s wine is OK.

“You won’t have the same flavor profile and the same quality as you do in California,” Walker said, referring to the fact that harvest in North Carolina comes much earlier. “The question is how do you solve that problem? Look at growing conditions or do you plant other varieties?


Some say that North Carolina should not be comparing itself to California, with its $1.9 billion in annual farm wine grape sales and $45.4 billion in revenues to wine and allied industries.


“North Carolina can’t be Napa, and Napa can’t be North Carolina,” Giese said.


And the same goes for France.


“The French only have 1,000 years on us, and California has 200 years,” he said.


Giese likens the industry in North Carolina to a teenager.


“Right now, we’re just getting the hang of what we’re doing. Eight or nine years, when the vines are in longer, you’ll see a change in quality,” he said. “So, right now, we’re doing it, but we’re growing.”


• Sherry Youngquist can be reached in Mount Airy at (336) 789-9338 or at syoungquist@wsjournal.com


 






































N.C. Va. Cali. N.Y. Oregon
Gallons produced annually: 600,000 762,000 560 million 40 million 1 million
Number of vineyards: 350 262 4,000 1,000 709
Acres of vineyards: 1,350 2,360 481,266 1,602 13,700
Economic impact: $79 million $95 million $45.4 billion $420 million $1 billion

This story can be found at: http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ/MGArticle/WSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031785402108